

Shinhwa member Lee Minwoo has won a first-instance civil ruling against a broadcasting writer who defrauded him of approximately 2.5 billion won by falsely claiming she could influence prosecutors handling a previous case involving him.
According to Herald Economy, the Seoul Central District Court’s Civil Division 15 ruled in late July that the writer, identified as A, must pay Lee approximately 2.5 billion won in damages. The amount corresponds to the fraud proceeds previously recognized in A’s criminal case.
The case dates back to June 2019, when Lee was investigated over allegations of sexually molesting women in their 20s at a bar. Police forwarded the case to prosecutors after concluding that the allegations warranted referral. The following day, A told Lee that she could use connections inside the prosecution to help him receive a non-indictment decision and took 250 million won from him.
Over the following year, A continued obtaining money from Lee under various pretexts, including supposed costs for arranging a high-ranking prosecutor, preventing scrutiny from the prosecution’s inspection division, and analyzing CCTV footage. Lee ultimately received a non-indictment disposition in December 2019 independently of A’s actions, but A continued the scheme by claiming prosecutors might reverse the decision and demanding additional money.
A also allegedly told Lee to borrow money from a wealthy friend, hand over control of his bank account, sell luxury goods for cash, and take out a loan using his home as collateral. Investigators determined that A had no ability to influence prosecutors and never intended to use the money for such purposes. The total amount obtained over roughly a year reached approximately 2.5 billion won.
In the related criminal case, the Supreme Court finalized A’s seven-year prison sentence last July and ordered the forfeiture of approximately 2.5 billion won in criminal proceeds. Lee later filed a separate civil damages suit.
A argued that being required to pay Lee after the criminal forfeiture would amount to double compensation. The civil court rejected that argument, explaining that criminal forfeiture is a punishment designed to deprive an offender of illegally obtained assets, while civil damages compensate the victim and serve a different purpose.
The civil judgment is not yet final. Both sides have appealed, and the case is currently pending before the Seoul High Court.
Netizen Reactions
The sampled Nate News comments included support for Lee Minwoo, criticism of financial-crime penalties, and skepticism over how difficult it may be to actually recover the money.
0 Comments